On Assignment

Jason Geil/The Cincinnati Post

Hey photogs,

Here’s an oft-discussed and old topic that I’ve recently thought about and I’m hoping to see your takes on the subject…

http://www.reuters.com/article/RCOMUS_NWS/idUSRTXDGA7

Basically, i think you’ve all encountered, or even shot photos where the horizon was purposely tilted for dramatic compositional effect. Personally, i’ve never like it. I think its a huge cliché and way over-used by wedding photographers, etc (i’m biased against that stuff as some of you know). But, I do occasionally see photojournalists employ the technique, whether on-purpose or accidental, and i’ve come to realize their occasional appropriateness, nay brilliance, when employed correctly.

So, what do you guys think?

- Do you share the belief that news photos should always convey scenes in the most ‘natural’ angles and views?

- Is it ethical to tilt? Can it be both appropriate and when can it be inappropriate? (I just find myself artistically challenged so that’s probably why i’ve shunned the technique…)

- Is it just a stupid fad?

Here’s two photog’s views, first FOR, and the other AGAINST (above image from him):
http://www.aperculture.com/aperculture-blog/2008/9/30/when-in-doubt-tilt.html

http://frontier.cincinnati.com/blogs/photos/2006/12/tilt-frame-ugg.asp

Finally, a quick fun (but deep?) question to chew on: What type of photojournalist are you?
See the 3 types here: http://blog.kevinmoloney.com/?p=196

Share This